Superstitions are in reality an unreasonable conviction which is held by people and even though there is no confirmation available that they are accurate, they do bring about some apprehension when circumstances play out. Basically these fallacies are internal convictions with reference to the overall functioning of the world.
Science in contrast is the accretion of knowledge; it is established on accurate surveillance. It is a very lengthy and extensive process to influence variables. There is dissimilarity between scientific viewpoints and false notions but that peculiarity is hard to recognize. The way we consider is not clearly separated onto two groups, similarly as it is hard to differentiate amid scientific faith and superstition. Superstition is a technique of assessment where an entity is won over those taboo activities forces appalling things to occur. It is grueling to say that any person is completely free of any fallacy at all. In order to check that you are superstitious or not merely try changing your routine for a day.
If you will feel that you are not doing things in an appropriate order will direct to something ghastly happening or you will be uncomfortable. Thus superstition is backed by recurring incidents.
Scientific belief is established on knowledge which has been cyclically investigated. Though it is tricky to know that not the whole lot we believe has been scientifically examined. We cannot back up our every step with a scientific reason. We need to be more realistic about the way we move toward things. From time to time it is scandalous to learn that what we considered to be a scientific belief is a built-up legend. It is difficult to give up our viewpoint at times and to choose something more reasonable. Scientific history emphasizes that often when the world transforms and nation is still holding on to older ways of judgment even when it is obvious that it has become unreasonable to think that way.
Superstition and scientific viewpoints are dissimilar in some ways; they also have some portion in common. A superstitious individual sees the humankind and function in the world according to the boundaries of his own world view while a scientist would come up to certain query and discover them because devoting their time on this finding would help move forward a certain world. Both will take for granted that their assumptions are more important. We should not feel miserable if our theory is debunked.