If we have to choose between safeguarding and annihilating the long forgotten historic buildings, Mostly will choose preserving. Diverse people have different viewpoints in this respect. My notion is that a city should conserve historical monuments. Being the bud vase of human commotion, edifices are obviously a reservoir of our ancient past and culture. To some degree, maintaining those stands for our respect to the preceding cohort.
Conservation of historical monuments engage maintaining the veracity & integrity of the location through fortification and restoration using erstwhile and modern materials. The preservation includes more than a few stages which include rehabilitation, re-establishment and strengthening.
One of the countless reasons to preserve historical buildings is the disposition they bring to locality. Spaces with the past have character. They convey a definite allure to a zone which new buildings lack. Old buildings are beautiful and soothing to watch.
Historical institutions serve as souvenir of the past.
Historical buildings enable us to comprehend the past and act as a reminder. Architecture permits people to appreciate their present situation and where they are advanced. It tells us what the society have dealt with and act as visual knack-knack of their gone days. It tells us much about past and how a particular situation was faced so that we can get an idea and work genuinely in a similar situation in future.
Conserving our ancient heritage gives us understanding and confidence for the imminent. All buildings have their individual historical milieu. We know about the coliseum because it is preserved. These buildings tend to accentuate the civilization and ancient heritage of the place.
Finally, preserving old historic building means respecting the preceding cohort. There are chances that old buildings will have downbeat effect on the cityscape or its utility, however, with the deliberation of high opinion for our forefathers, we cannot annihilate them for contemporary buildings. On the other hand, we have the responsibility of preserving them to our next generations so that they could have the opportunity to know about their predecessors tangibly.
Destroying old monuments can profitable in many ways. We can have new building to live in and much more. But all that in the cost of our heritage, is that worth it?
Outsiders crave to see monuments on visiting any new place. Merely up-to-the-minute buildings are not enough to magnetize day-trippers. Buildings from way back are live credentials of the past time of that city and shouldn’;;t be disconnected to develop new buildings.