For years, the professional design and production is mainly done on a Mac. PC were office workers, the players, not developers. But with the PC dominates the world of computers and advances in the Windows operating system, the only reason to use a Mac for design work began in earnest theft. But myths persist and new designers are faced with a decision on whether to get a Mac or a leap forward and show that whatever the Mac can do, the PC can do too.
The introduction of a series of software programs for desktop publishing use for the Windows platform has meant that more and more end users of these PCs will appeal to professional layout and design work. And they wanted to keep their computer. But the Mac has always been the ideal platform for the design professional, and Windows users, these were sometimes still is not seen as a serious hobby.
As some of these new artists moved into the professional field, instead of leaving the platform of your choice I’ve tried to do the work for them in the field dominated by Mac desktop publishing. Others have made the switch. There are still those who insist that the Macintosh platform is higher for serious design work, but the differences are more difficult to recognize and emotional factors, and old news dominated most of the arguments
Several additional software has always been one of the standards for the PC on a Mac Which DTP services, all major desktop publishing software packages are available for versions of Windows. The vast majority of middle-level desktop publishing and consumer products are only available for PC-to help designers to move up the ranks, without sacrificing investment in hardware and software.
Layout and graphics related to graphics-intensive tasks, and Mac are used to dominate the rapidly address these tasks. Today’s computers are connected and the speed differences are practically nonexistent.
PC is dominated by businesses and consumers around the world. For those who need to maintain backward compatibility for users, such as running the same office, e-mail programs, proprietary software, games and even then having a computer makes this possible.
Major arguments focus on the Mac GUI, compared to text-based interface on the PC. However, Windows graphics put a face on the PC and PC with Windows XP with the environment has been updated so that the OS X operating system Mac and Windows look and feel are very similar.
Some service companies and printers are resistant to support PC files. With more than professional designers who are also PC users who are flooding the market, it is inevitable that these recalcitrant evolve over time by acquiring Windows PC and the hiring of new employees or training existing workers in processing files your PC. Meanwhile, Mac users who need to work closely with commercial service providers have an advantage in terms of compatibility and general acceptance. This could also result in cost savings for the Mac user and service providers accustomed to PC files can charge more for handling.
For high-end work into play color accuracy is absolutely necessary, the Mac can still have a slight advantage.
What is cross-platform compatibility, the Mac wins. Although there are programs that allow the computer to work with Mac at the time, usually works better the other way.
The decreasing cost of PCs compared to Macs has contributed to the growth of the PC market. However, the cost of the computer is generally relevant only for basic machines. For speed, storage capacity and graphics capabilities required for most jobs in the professional design to push the cost of Windows PCs closer to the cost of comparable functionality Macintosh.
Some of the arguments against emotional or PC is a matter of principle, as the bias against Microsoft. Go to Apple and Macintosh can be viewed as an act of rebellion against the norms of PC ownership. If it makes the user feel good, why not.
The choice between a Windows PC and Mac for professional publishing and graphic summarizes the design work up to personal preference or because you can handle the job. Where it is possible to have both an ideal situation but expensive.
As for working with commercial providers, the growing number of PC applications submitted by the professional and lay, ultimately forcing more and more printers to adapt to the PC platform. The designer of PC may have to shop a little more work and maybe just a little harder to ensure that the files they produce are no problems, so Mac suppliers will have less difficulty in dealing with them, but are good things.
The old arguments for relief that only a Mac will do serious design work is no longer valid. Either it will work.