Was the result of teamwork by the Department of Geography and Geographic Alliance to carry out research on cultural diversity. The Institute took four weeks from June 29 -16 July 2004 (Butefish, 2005). The institute was granted by the NEH (National Endowment for the Humanities) is the third time in three years to fund these institutions, while funding was material from the National Geographic Society Education Foundation. Special Initiative on Cultural Diversity Institute of South America was for the people named it the “We the People” initiative. His principal was trying to strengthen and promote research, teaching and understanding of American culture and history. To achieve this venture in support of exploration projects of important issues and events of the culture of the states and the definition of American history through advanced knowledge (Butefish, 2005). Participants came from all corners of the United States with every state represented by at least four participants who were mostly teachers. The main objectives of the institute are: (a) to demonstrate the integration of geography with social sciences and humanities disciplines, (b) to show how it is taught can instill the accessibility of rich source material and interpretation of data through geography through the use of equipment and raw materials, and (c) finally was to provide study opportunities for teachers to have first hand experience of the growing diversity of South America. For the success of the institute, Dr. Charles Aiken, director of the Institute incorporated a number of discussion leaders and visiting scholars who prepared the presentation different. As can be seen to reach a large number of teachers can be the simplest channel. Your best explained through post high school assessment. Teachers are able to bring a positive awareness of their criticism is proportional to that experienced by students who try.
WATER – PERFORMANCE ESTIMATES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL LOADS: A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASURING ISOTOPIC APPROACH VERSUS
This is an aquatic ecosystem perspective to refine and quantify the water critical loads of acid in water-logged areas of the lakes in northeastern Alberta. Isotope uptake is based on extremely low yields of water, with sand deposition in lakes and tributaries leading to acid sensitivity (Bennett et al., 2008). Is performed through the measurement of 2H and O18 isotope enrichment through evaporation and physical weather data. In Alberta, water runoff from the lakes varies from 5 to 395 mm annually, although difficult to estimate hydrometric water production. The materials and methods of estimation include: (1) Description of the town, by the Regional Monitoring Program Water (2004), depends on where the lake is in regard to air temperature. It tests the acidity of water (2) physical data collection, the depth from which the sample is collected. Depends on the geographic information system using information system and digital orthophoto. (3) model parameterization methodology. This model involves the use of isotope mass balance to estimate the runoff lakes and water production.
The result through isotopic systems and hydrological indicators show the evaporation leads to acidity. The critical load of the oil sands development leads to water acidity. The study involves research shows alternative estimates of the specific site water yields. By comparing isotopic in Alberta and water survey of Canada are both based on the landscape. IMB and MSM can not be compared directly due to the difficulty in measuring lake (Bennett et al., 2008).
The survey estimates of the availability of long-term average data. The results are either through isotope systematic survey describing the boreal and arctic water while the control hydrological indicators of water loss through evaporation. Testing the acidity of water through both methods help to solve the problem of aquatic life. It also helps in critical load due to balance-marine concentration.
Masculinist epistemologies POLICY AND FIELD WORK IN GEOGRAPHY Latin Americanist
If you meet the Latin American country, or in contact with immigrants from Latin America that he or she will know that no dialogue between the male and female. This is raised by cultural anthropology. Feminist geographers “rarely engage in the politics of fieldwork (Sundberg, 2003). Epistemological and pedagogical levels fall through the development of feminist theories of knowledge and promote gender equality in the field . This is up and prepare students of both sexes in the field work policy which increases the research agendas.
feminist field workers in Guatemala’s anxiety to bring the truth that led to the contradiction in the authorized account of changes in the landscape. The integration of both male and female geographers gives immaculate universal status. The participation in political life femininity through current literature present geographical sectors bearing the misleading articles in the presentations. When the field is the gender survey format attracts furnished rooms for individuals willing to articulate their experiences. In the comparison of case studies conducted by field awareness to women and those made after it is clear that the study after more useful. The reason behind this is that women could not open to men, while men on the other side were open to women and men of the partner. Bringing gender balances in the resolution of problems (Sundberg, 2003).
My thesis is that with awareness and the incorporation of the feminine in the field has resulted in more troubleshooting. Women enjoy more academic lady issues are hidden from the male students. With the embrace of the notion of feminine silence alternative Latin American male methodologies break. This helps in the establishment of relations of power as female scholar Rose said. The integration strengthens the researchers to reify the differences as shown in the field.